I am a staunch proponent of natural health. The profound power of botanicals, fasting, a raw living diet, and other holistic, non-toxic modalities has been unveiled to me over the course of the last eighteen years through numerous transformations that contradicted and would confound mainstream medical science. Yet, I am no irrational ideologue whose myopic and linear fixation precludes sound discernment. Reason is the foremost foundation of my philosophy and the principal criterion that governs my conduct, whether in health or any other area of life.
As a rational, pragmatic, balanced, wholistically minded person and natural health advocate, I do not invariably reject Western medicine, nor any other medical modality or practice. In fact, I fully recognize the value of allopathic acute care (only an obstinate doctrinaire would dismiss allopathy in its entirety). However, can standard clinical care contribute anything of value beyond emergency medicine? In certain situations, certainly so.
Over the years, I have discussed at length the egregious deficiencies within modern healthcare’s (what some people rightfully refer to as “sickcare”) approach to chronic conditions, including cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, cancer, diabetes, autoimmune disorders, dementia, and other persistent, usually lifestyle-engendered, maladies. I confidently maintain the position — backed by incontrovertible facts and data — that, in the overwhelming majority of chronic complaints (ridding the body thereof), allopathy is patently ineffective and, more often than not, highly deleterious. This holds particularly true for conventional oncology, which operates on intellectually indefensible theories that defy common sense. What else can one call the routine inundation of an already systemically compromised body with chemicals so caustic that their handling necessitates the use of a full-body, hazmat-like, protective suit for cleanup? As a pertinent personal anecdote, I recall my grandmother telling me that, during the chemotherapy treatment she underwent (in the late 1970s) for breast cancer, the drugs spilled during one of her sessions and burned a sizable hole through her clothing. Chemotherapy is a veritable affront to natural law, for which patients unfortunately often pay with their lives. That being said, there is a caveat or nuance here…
While I firmly oppose the routine administration of chemotherapy as a long-term cancer management strategy, there are circumstances in which chemotherapeutic regimens may serve as a form of emergency medical intervention. A prime example would be the presence of a rapidly proliferating, life-threatening, chemosensitive tumor whose surgical excision is either unfeasible or would permanently alter the body and its functions. If said tumor were located within the colon and causing a near-total bowel obstruction, this would constitute a medical emergency that might render the incorporation of “chemo” prudent. However, in such a scenario, I would most strongly recommend considering what is known as insulin potentiation therapy (IPT) to attenuate the toxic burden imposed on the body. (In IPT, insulin is given prior to the infusion of toxic chemotherapeutic agents in order to render cancer cells more susceptible to them, and thus allow for lower drug dosages. This significantly reduces the otherwise inevitable, and often debilitating, side effects or symptoms of the toxic drugs.) Immediately following this transient treatment, I would recommend implementing drastic dietary and lifestyle interventions as the foundation for long-term healing and recovery.
Click here to book a personal consultation with Akin.
For access to in-depth protocols, direct support from Akin, and exclusive resources, join the Intelligent Living Club.
To receive comprehensive one-on-one guidance from Akin, see Personal Guidance
